Godless Engineering
  • Home
  • Contact
  • Affiliates
  • Social Media
  • Blog
  • Videos
  • About
  • Newsletter
Select Page

Matthew Couldn’t Have Fabricated A Zombie Attack

by Godless Engineer | Feb 17, 2020 | 3 comments

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

3 Comments

  1. jj
    jj on June 17, 2020 at 1:24 pm

    Matthew wrote especially to the jews and so the curtain of the temple and the OT believers would be of special importance. And without this agenda there would be no reason for Paul or Mark to record any of that.
    Matthew doesnt mention the destruction of Jerusalem and that gives rise to a date pre AD70
    They didnt come out of the tombs until the resurrection. Read carefully.
    Thallus thought the darkness was an eclipse but was wrong and so ur contention that there was no eclipse at that time is empty.
    Its unlikely that they were lying because the resurrection was what transformed them and that events in itself did not need to be supported by anything but their personal testimony of the event itself and to add details and lie about them is highly unlikely.
    Zombies is an inaccurate term since we know that when Jesus rose the dead the people were as good as new and when Jesus HIMSELF was raised HE was better than even. Zombies retain a decayed and rotting body and that is not what we see with the resurrections of Jesus. join me on Facebook in the discussion group “Crushing all Atheist, Evolutionist and Muslim arguments” which i run.

  2. jj
    jj on June 18, 2020 at 9:12 am

    Matthew wrote especially to the jews and so the curtain of the temple and the OT believers would be of special importance. And without this agenda there would be no reason for Paul or Mark to record any of that.
    Matthew doesnt mention the destruction of Jerusalem and that gives rise to a date pre AD70
    They didnt come out of the tombs until the resurrection. Read carefully.
    Thallus thought the darkness was an eclipse but was wrong and so ur contention that there was no eclipse at that time is empty.
    Its unlikely that they were lying because the resurrection was what transformed them and that events in itself did not need to be supported by anything but their personal testimony of the event itself and to add details and lie about them is highly unlikely.
    Zombies is an inaccurate term since we know that when Jesus rose the dead the people were as good as new and when Jesus HIMSELF was raised HE was better than even. Zombies retain a decayed and rotting body and that is not what we see with the resurrections of Jesus.

    • jj
      jj on June 18, 2020 at 1:34 pm

      Matthew wrote especially to the jews and so the curtain of the temple and the OT believers would be of special importance. And without this agenda there would be no reason for Paul or Mark to record any of that.
      Matthew doesnt mention the destruction of Jerusalem and that gives rise to a date pre AD70
      They didnt come out of the tombs until the resurrection. Read carefully.
      Thallus thought the darkness was an eclipse but was wrong and so ur contention that there was no eclipse at that time is empty.
      Its unlikely that they were lying because the resurrection was what transformed them and that events in itself did not need to be supported by anything but their personal testimony of the event itself and to add details and lie about them is highly unlikely.
      Zombies is an inaccurate term since we know that when Jesus rose the dead the people were as good as new and when Jesus HIMSELF was raised HE was better than even. Zombies retain a decayed and rotting body and that is not what we see with the resurrections of Jesus.

%d